🏳️🌈🏺🛐 Leviticus Bible 3
🏳️🌈🏺2-GAY IN HISTORY🏺🏳️🌈
If someone quotes Leviticus 18:22 or 20:13 at you, start with reading the whole chapter. Leviticus 18–20 isn’t a universal sexual ethic; it’s a temple-centered holiness system—taboo vocabulary (“abomination”), impurity logic (“defilement”), and land theology (“the land will vomit you out”).
Leviticus, actually codified in 5th-ish century BC, tells you what it’s doing. It frames the list as us vs them: “You shall not do as they do in the land of Egypt… or in the land of Canaan” (18:3). It’s boundary-making for a small, anxious, vulnerable, people sandwiched between permissive superpowers—it marks rules to police their own people and keep the land “clean.”
It’s just patriarchy in legal form. These chapters address men and regulate who can access which bodies in a kinship economy (inheritance, honor, household). The Hebrew phrase “as with a woman” (lit. “the lyings of a woman”) codes a gender hierarchy in which a free male must never be placed in the socially feminized sexual role. Women are property and only explicitly prohibited to be with animals, because bestiality is treated as category-collapse pollution with social inferiors, both parties are killed.
Then Leviticus 20 shows its hand: purge logic. Death penalties for boundary breaches—adultery, cursing parents, only certain kinds of incest, fashion choices, and foreign rites—followed by “their blood is upon them,” ie bloodguilt blame shifting. If your modern ethic depends on importing that land/temple purge regime, you’re not reading ‘timeless morality,’ you’re an ancient sacrifice cosplayer.
Just remember: the holiness code has death penalties for lots of things, like psychics, blasphemers, and businesses open on Sundays(sabbath). It’s also fine with slavery (Lev 25) and has a lot of feelings about beard grooming. So treating this as a buffet where the only eternal item is condemning queer intimacy isn’t fidelity—it’s hate.
TLDR: these verses belong to an ancient purity-patriarchy project with premises no one, including Christians, still accept. Read them whole, put it in context, and refuse to let temple-boundary norms be used as a veto on mutual-consenting love.
*Neighboring cultures—such as Persia, Neo-Babylonia, Phoenician city-states, and other Levantine societies—regulated same-sex acts primarily through status, role, and honor rather than through purity or land-defilement systems. These cultures did not frame such acts as covenant pollution or threats to sacred territory.
Later Greek and Greco-influenced states operated with their own sexual logics, often more openly accommodating certain same-sex relationships within structured social norms. The encounter with these worlds—especially under Hellenistic rule—only sharpened Jewish boundary-making and helped entrench the distinctive prohibitions found in the Holiness Code.
Sorry for the family guy meme
